07/03/2024 / By Ethan Huff
Judgment day is coming for pharmaceutical giant Pfizer now that Kansas, Idaho and three other thus far unnamed states are suing the company for misleading Americans about its modRNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines.”
Led by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, the lawsuits allege that Pfizer violated various state statutes – in Kansas it is called the Consumer Protection Act – by falsely claiming that its COVID injections are “safe and effective” against the Chinese Virus.
Pfizer willfully concealed, suppressed and omitted material facts, Kobach alleges, about its chemical shots, which were fast-tracked onto the market through Operation Warp Speed, resulting in many injuries and deaths.
“Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women,” Kobach said in a statement.
“However, in February of 2021 (they) possessed reports of 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an adverse event, and more than 10% reported a miscarriage.”
Peter Imanuelsen of The Freedom Corner says all five of these lawsuits are “huge news.” They could be enough to really hit hard against a corporate pharmaceutical giant that for decades has been getting away with murder.
“I started to notice something really weird with birth rate statistics,” Imanuelsen writes. “You see, about 9 months after the covid injections were rolled out, we saw a massive collapse in birthrates.”
“Not only that, but we saw that women that did not get the covid injection were overrepresented in giving birth. This made me think.”
(Related: Check out our earlier report about Kobach’s claim that Pfizer misled Kansans on COVID injections.)
Every American deserves a cut of the $75 billion that Pfizer raked in from sales of its COVID shots. That money would best be clawed back from Albert Bourla and his minions, and instead given to We the People who were defrauded by Pfizer.
Remember that Pfizer never ran any true clinical trials as claimed. The few trials that Pfizer claims to have conducted were sham operations “designed, run, analysed and authored by Pfizer employees,” Imanuelsen explains.
One of these sham studies was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) back in April 2021. It claimed that preliminary findings showed no significant safety concerns among pregnant women who got shot for COVID.
The observed miscarriages were not unusual, that same study claimed, and were probably not even a direct result of the shots.
Nearly a year later, in February 2022, another study was published in the journal Medicine that contradicted the first. It found that “adverse events” from COVID injections are especially pronounced in pregnant women, who face a 17 percent greater risk compared to the general population.
Despite all this, Pfizer lied to the public and to pregnant women specifically, urging them to take the shots because they had been “proven” to be “safe and effective.”
“Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccination stopped transmission,” Kobach said.
“Pfizer later admitted that they’ve never even studied transmission after the recipients receive the vaccine.”
In a public statement, Pfizer said that the lawsuits have “no merit,” and that the company will “respond to the suit in due course.”
“Pfizer is deeply committed to the well-being of the patients it serves and has no higher priority than ensuring the safety and effectiveness of its treatments and vaccines,” Pfizer further said in its own defense.
The latest news about Big Pharma’s crimes against humanity can be found at BadMedicine.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
BadMedicine.News is a fact-based public education website published by BadMedicine News Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2019 by BadMedicine News Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.